PETCO discriminated against me and my service dog on the ADA's 25th anniversary

The headline almost reads like an SNL parody or a headline from the Onion. “PETCO Discriminates Against Patron With Service Dog on ADA 25th Anniversary: Company Cites Policy” However bizarre, it’s real. On the heels of celebrating the 25th anniversary of the ADA, I find my experience this weekend jaw dropping, offensive and particularly timely.

So what happened?

This past Saturday I visited a local PETCO in Washington D.C. (Store 782) as I have done every month for the past two years to groom my beloved service dog. Upon arriving I was made aware of a newly established policy prohibiting pet owners from accompanying their pets into the grooming area. Having been a loyal patron for years, and previously accompanying him without issue, I reminded them that Pico was in fact a service dog and not a pet. Further, I reiterated that by law I am required to maintain control of my dog at all times while in public either by leash, or in some instances other voice commands and that attempting to separate us was a violation of the American’s with Disabilities Act.

According to ADA.gov

Under the ADA, service animals must be harnessed, leashed, or tethered, unless these devices interfere with the service animal’s work or the individual’s disability prevents using these devices. In that case, the individual must maintain control of the animal through voice, signal, or other effective controls.

Further the law states

A person with a disability cannot be asked to remove his service animal from the premises unless: (1) the dog is out of control and the handler does not take effective action to control it or (2) the dog is not housebroken. When there is a legitimate reason to ask that a service animal be removed, staff must offer the person with the disability the opportunity to obtain goods or services without the animal’s presence.

After reiterating the above, I was advised that the crackdown on corporate policy was firm. I was told that if I wanted my dog groomed, I would have to relinquish him to a groomer, and wait in an adjacent room. I would have no ability to control my dog’s behavior as required by federal law.

When no agreement could be reached between myself and the interim manager (who only identified himself by his first name), he became increasingly hostile. He didn’t need any educating on the ADA, he told me. He had previously worked on the Hill, and with Congress and was thereby, all-knowing. He followed by encouraging me to file a complaint with PETCO and even advised me to pursue legal action if I felt that was appropriate. The policy however, would stand.

Steadfast in my conviction, I called the customer relations number he had given me moments ago. Surely this would lead to a resolution.

I spoke briefly to a customer service representative and briefed her on the circumstances. She asked to speak with the interim manager and I stood by listening to him explain how the shift in policy occurred recently as the result of the district manager reprimanding an employee for not previously enforcing it. When they completed the brief exchange, I came back on the line only to hear the representative cite the policy in place, as if I hadn’t been standing there to hear the exchange moments before. “Oh, it’s policy?” I thought to myself. “That clears everything up.” Not to worry. I’m told that the issue is being “escalated” and that the district manager will follow up with me on my complaint. Never mind that it was the district manager who was enforcing the discriminatory corporate policy.

At this point I opted to leave the store and continue my conversations outside hopeful that I would reach a customer service representative who wasn’t so tone deaf as to rely on reciting the script used by the previous representative.

Nearly 90 minutes and three representatives later, I’ve gotten absolutely nowhere. I’m promised a follow up by the district manager once again. Nobody has uttered anything close to an apology for how I’ve been treated.

Frustrated by the lack of progress, I kicked into activism mode. I stood outside the store taking the opportunity to educate would-be patrons before entering that PETCO did not support the ADA or patrons with disabilities. I engaged a few and took solace in having done something.

The interim manager upon discovering my activism was less than pleased and went as far as to call my response “vindictive.” Then, adding insult to injury he offered to take my dog in the back in the grooming area “as long as I was out there.” Once again proving he missed the point entirely.

“Has your policy suddenly changed?” I inquired.

“No,” he says.

“Then you’re still violating federal law.”

“I can offer you a bag of dog food for your trouble,” he says without a hint of irony.

“Thanks, but no.” I said.

He went a good distance to smoke a cigarette and that was the last I saw of him before heading home, now having spent three hours at PETCO trying to get my dog groomed.

Having felt like I’d officially entered the Twilight Zone, I reached out to PETCO on Twitter.

Their response came fast. “Can you direct message (DM) more details so we may get in touch with you?”

My excitement and hopes that I had possibly reached a compassionate (if not PR-savvy individual) were quickly dashed. Upon sending a DM with my information, their reply was equally daft. “The district manager has been made aware of the issue and will be the one to work with you.” When I point out that nobody has apologized in the slightest for my experience, they follow up with another direct message that read, “We apologize.” No doubt that had to be vetted by their lawyers.

So slightly more than 48 hours have passed and PETCO has taken no visible action to reverse this discriminatory policy or hold anyone accountable. PETCO, their corporate team, and their public relations team are bewilderingly and to their own detriment standing behind their discriminatory practices.

With recent celebrations nationwide about all the progress made thanks to the ADA, this past weekend reminds us all that there is still much work to be done.

Sign my petition and tell PETCO to stop discriminating against people with disabilities.

How Brian Williams can reclaim the anchor chair—if he wants it.

Tuning in to “NBC Nightly News” on Wednesday, it was clear that NBC execs were moving swiftly ahead for a post-Brian Williams era. Noticeably absent from the opening title sequence was the name of the embattled anchor and former managing editor who was suspended Tuesday by NBC brass for six months without pay for embellishments he made while reporting on the Iraq War in 2003.

Once the most trusted name in network news, Williams’ credibility has taken a nosedivesince admitting last week he “misremembered” the events told on the January 30 broadcast about being aboard an aircraft hit by a rocket-propelled grenade, (RPG) a story he’d repeated countless times. A tribute by NBC prior to Williams’ truth-challenged broadcast celebrating his tenure with the network has suddenly disappeared from the airwaves, instead replaced by an internal investigation that has uncovered other instances of Williams’ exaggerations.

Watching Williams‘ downfall over the past two weeks has elicited a series of responses. While the debate over Williams’ future intensifies, some have come to his defense, including Time, Huffington Post, and famed warlock Charlie Sheen, who called the whole thing nothing but a witch hunt. Still others remain convinced that having eroded the public’s trust virtually overnight, his suspension is merely the beginning of an exit strategy and a return to the anchor chair later this summer is near impossible. In addition to spawning a series of memes, and inspiring the #BrianWilliamsMisremembers hashtag on Twitter, the Double-A affiliate of the Cleveland Indians—the Akron RubberDucks—announced plans to host a Brian Williams “Pants on Fire” night in April.

Indeed Williams’ actions have forced NBC into crisis mode as they scramble to limit the damage done by their once star anchor. After 10 years at the helm of “NBC Nightly News,” weekend anchor Lester Holt is currently assuming Williams’ duties and may be doing more than simply keeping the seat warm if he can prove to be a ratings success.

With six months of free time and $5 million less in his pocket, Williams has a lot of time to think about how he can begin to win back the trust of the American people, only 34% of whom find him credible. A recent survey by The Marketing Arm shows Kate Middleton has more credibility among Americans than Williams at the moment. He may very well be fighting for his career and reputation once the suspension concludes, but if the beleaguered newsman intends on returning to life behind the anchor desk, the seeds must be planted now.

Here are three things Williams should do during his time off if he wants to reclaim the anchor chair this summer:

1). Apologize to the public: Following the outcry after Williams first reported to have been in an aircraft hit by an RPG, Williams went on air and issued a half-baked apologythat was clearly written and vetted by NBC in an attempt to save himself and the network further embarrassment. The challenge with carefully crafted apologies such as this is that they fail to come off as sincere. When Williams returns, his effort to rebuild public trust with the nearly 9 million people who invited him into their homes on a nightly basis must begin with a sincere apology for his missteps without attempting justify his actions. Williams simply must fall on his sword. A heartfelt apology with no PR buzzwords to set off the alarms will go a long way.

2). Volunteer with veterans: Williams got himself in trouble by exaggerating his involvement covering the Iraq War, and quite possibly lied about his involvement with SEAL Team Six. He needs to show contrition to the men and women of our military whose sacrifice he has trivialized by making himself unnecessarily part of the story for the benefit of ratings and sensationalism. His apology should be done with no fanfare and completely under the radar; no camera crew looking for a photo op or b-roll. This isn’t about Williams at all. If Williams wants to talk about the experience down the line once he’s reestablished himself, he should feel free to do so. He’ll find that the story will get told in much the same way this most recent one exposed him, by the people who were there who want the record reflected accurately.

3). Stay out of the public eye: Those close to Williams describe him as being wrought with remorse since the controversy broke, and he may be. But he should not find it necessary to unburden his soul like so many disgraced public figures before him by committing to a round of public appearances, press conferences and talk shows confessing his deepest personal and/or journalistic sins. As challenging as it may be for someone who has spent his career talking (and entertaining) for a living, he’s going to have to lay low for a while and assess the damage. Then he can decide what direction he wants his career to go. Maybe he’d prefer taking over “The Daily Show” from a departing Jon Stewart, where news and entertainment blend together.

If NBC Universal CEO Steve Burke truly believes Williams deserves another chance and the network is pulling for him, then the beginning of rehabilitating his public image starts now.

THE NON SPORTS FANS SURVIVAL GUIDE TO SUPER BOWL XLIX

We’re just a little more than 24 hours from Super Bowl XLIX in Arizona.

That means it’s time for a public service announcement about surviving the biggest game of the year: the annual Non Sports Fans Survival Guide to the Super Bowl. As Lewis Black reminds us, it’s important for man to have a ritual.

Let’s just get this out of the way. You’re welcome.

Roger Goodell’s promise to “thoroughly and objectively” investigate Deflategate or the various takes on Marshawn Lynch’s behavior antics on NFL Media Day—including Michael Weinreb of Rolling Stone comparing him to Edward Snowden—have dominated the conversation so heavily in the past week that the game itself seems almost like an afterthought, unless you’re from either New England or Seattle. Then the mayhem is certainly inescapable. Seattle is so ecstatic to be in the Super Bowl again that the city is planning a celebration regardless of the outcome.

Much has been made about the Seahawks vs. Patriots matchup, but the fun facts don’t stop there. Super Bowl Sunday is also the only day of the year where commercials matter more to some than the game itself despite the fact that, for the last several years, most of the ads begin circulating online for days ahead of kickoff generating a lot of pregame conversation–both positive and negative.

Go Daddy’s controversial “Journey Home” spot didn’t even live long enough to see game day following a social media backlash panning the ad for its insensitivity. On the flip side, the “Like a Girl” campaign from Always—which debuted to worldwide acclaim last summer—is set for a huge boost in viewership Sunday when the 60-second promo encouraging female empowerment reaches its largest audience yet.

Some argue with the ever-increasing trend of ads being teased online that the magic of Super Bowl ads is gone. I disagree. They start a conversation and ultimately most brands benefit from the added exposure. Historically, there have remained a few that manage to sneak in under the radar. So, despite the self-inflicted spoiler alerts, fans never quite know what to expect.

The fact is, only on Super Bowl Sunday is talking during commercials just as likely to get you ostracized as talking during game time. That’s how important this day is to our country. The USDA ranks the Super Bowl as the second highest day for food consumption nationwide, behind Thanksgiving. That fun fact explains renewed pleas like this one to make the Monday after the Super Bowl a national holiday. However, if we haven’t yet persuaded the federal government to declare Election Day a holiday to encourage voting, (something that only occurs once every four years), then the idea of a Super Bowl Monday is about as long a shot as Mitt Romney running for president. We can dream, can’t we?

Every Super Bowl party also has its share of individuals, be they wives, girlfriends, or non sports savvy friends, who are there likely against their will. But since Super Bowl Sunday might as well be declared a national holiday, they didn’t want to be alone. If you find yourself in this group, fear not. Diane Turbyfill over at the Gaston Gazette has written Tips on How to Fit in on Super Bowl Sunday to help you, and if you are at all politically inclined, Jason Johnson of NBC News has written a similar piece titled “Top 10 Reasons Politicos Should Watch Super Bowl XLIX”

As helpful as these lists are, they still create a deep divide between the care and the care-nots, requiring the care-nots to in fact, care. They must study the above, learning names, definitions, and mundane details. Details that make them appear in the know. Details they will soon forget. Helpful? Sure, but what of those care-nots who don’t want to put in that much work? The solution is simple, and in fact, can be applied to every sports game, every day of the year. All you must do, and I have taught this to many, is remember four essential phrases and utter them enthusiastically at random intervals during the game. These phrases are:

1). “Did you see that?”

2). “Are you kidding me?”

3). “That’s such a b******t call!”

4). “Oh, c’mon! Whose side are you on, ref?”

Using these phrases you will fit in with any crowd for any sport, no pregame studying of players and facts required. Best of all this timesaving system is foolproof and the result of your effort will be noticed immediately. You may even make a new friend. Yes, the four phrase system is that easy. Usually sold for three easy payments of $19.95+S&H, today, it’s yours free. Call now and receive a fifth phrase that will guarantee your invitation to next year’s party, (while supplies last).

And finally, I predict Sunday’s winner, The Seattle Seahawks, by a final score of 23-20. Here’s to hoping the predictive powers of Madden 25 and the annual Super Bowl simulation are proven wrong. Besides, a Seattle win is better for the stock market.

THREE COMMUNICATION LESSONS FROM THE 2015 STATE OF THE UNION

Every year policy wonks around the country gleefully tune in to the State of the Union. It’s a big deal in Washington—as it should be. Our president, before congress, lays out his bold vision for the country. If the White House Correspondents’ Dinner is nerd prom, the State of the Union is the Super Bowl, and just like the Super Bowl, its ending is sure to disappoint at least half the country.

That might explain why over 50% of Americans said they planned to skip the speech entirely, with 45% saying it’s because the timing of the speech, 9:00 p.m., interfered with their preferred TV programing. Clearly the President of the United States is no match for “New Girl.”  

So if you’re tasked with writing a speech, what can you do to make it a compelling draw and maximize its impact on your audience? Here are three communication messaging takeaways from this year’s State of the Union.

Control the message: Gone are the days of passive media consumption. The name of the game in today’s social media landscape is engagement, and nowhere is that more evident than with the State of the Union. Throughout the night we’re watching it on TV, while simultaneously tweeting, and texting. If you’re following along reading the prepared remarks, therein lies another potential distraction. As one of my colleagues said to me Wednesday morning, “With four screens going, I admit I didn’t really get to hear the president.” Realizing the uphill battle for eyeballs Tuesday night, the White House was smart. In addition to releasing the prepared remarks ahead of time, (something they’ve done with increased frequency in recent years) they were live tweeting as well. They also heavily promoted a live enhanced version of the State of the Union on their website, including a interactive river of content designed to showcase administration policy. With information flying at incredible speed, their strategy was simple: make it easy for people to interact with and share prepackaged content. Well, it worked. The White House enhanced stream drew 1.2 million views, Twitter saw a total of 1,575,475 tweets and retweets using #SOTU on the day of the speech – about 25% growth relative to 2014—and many were fuelled by the president’s official Twitter feedas well as the White House, helping public messaging stay on course. In addition, if you chose to watch the White House YouTube stream, the president’s remarks were punctuated with statistics and visuals that would have otherwise been absent from the speech. The White House also followed the presidential address with its own Q&A session rather than show the Republican response, or rather, responses undercutting their message.

Going off script can be a good thing: Most communication is best done in a methodical, planned, and rehearsed fashion, especially when media is involved. There’s just too much at stake usually to shoot from the hip and not expect some sort of backfire. However, rules are meant to be broken, and when the Leader of the Free World wants to go off script, you let him. He did so twice on Tuesday night. First, when Republicans refused to applaud the economic recovery, Obama reminded them that the recovery was in fact, good news. The second time came during a rebuttal to Republicans who were all too happy to celebrate the looming end of Obama’s presidency. The eight words spoken off script ignited Twitter and quickly became the most talked about moment of the evening. Going off script can be tricky, but when done right can humanize a speaker and help drive a point home in a way that prepared remarks can’t.

Keep it short: The official runtime for the 2015 State of the Union was just under an hour, which is not historically succinct, unless we’re comparing Obama to President Clinton who’s credited with the longest speech on record—clocking in at nearly 90 minutes—in his final address to the nation in 2000. In 2015 it’s increasingly difficult to hold the attention of many for long periods. People’s attention spans are forever shrinking thanks to social media which by design encourages bite-sized communication. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was spotted taking a nap roughly 20 minutes into the president’s remarks. The shorter and more digestible you can make your communication, the better. 

Those are some of my top communication takeaways from the 2015 State of the Union. What were some of yours?

FOR BRANDS, ONLINE ENGAGEMENT IS ONLY HALF THE BATTLE.

Greg Weiss, Vice President of Social Media at MasterCard, gained a lot of attention yesterday when he said a brand that replies to his tweets makes more of an impact on him than years of advertising ever could. Coming from someone in Weiss’s position, the declaration immediately generated a ton of conversation online about the value of online engagement and its true impact on consumers and brands alike. 

So what exactly is the ROI of social media and consumer engagement? As Gary Vaynerchuck has famously said, “What’s the ROI of your mother?” You can’t quantify it, but you know its influence is there.

Engagement may be helpful to your brand (even necessary) but what matters is the motive behind it. Anyone can talk. More important is what you say, and why, and that’s true both online and off.

There certainly exists no shortage of brands continually shooting themselves in the foot by saying dumb things on social media in the name of engagement. Within the past 72 hours alone, we’ve witnessed Pat Sajack deny the reality of global warming and the Hooters franchise “joking” about rape. Both now find themselves in need of serious damage control.

In my own experience, I can think of two brands whose approach to online engagement differs so dramatically, their motives so starkly contrasted, that while one of them I applaud, the other is quickly climbing the ranks and on its way to becoming one I can only talk about with frustration and anger.

The Good: OtterBox 

As the tagline denotes, “We’ve got technology covered.” They certainly do. Every iPhone I’ve ever had is instantly outfitted with an OtterBox case. I believe, and have had such positive experiences with them and their product, that it’s not uncommon for me to hold off a device upgrade until they’ve developed the protection for it. Often this might mean waiting a month or two depending on the case, but it’s worth it.

How did I become such a loyalist? Simple. OtterBox time and time again stands by their product.

For the first few years, I went with the ruggedly stylish Defender series never experiencing any issues. With the introduction of their most recent line of waterproof cases for the iPhone 5S, I took the plunge and opted for their Preserver series. 

Though the case renders the iPhone virtually indestructible, and offers functionality exceeding that of its competition by far, the case is so precisely designed that the slightest bump can seemingly knock something out of alignment and soon having a conversation with clear audio becomes near impossible. I reached out to OtterBox on Twitter, and each time they were quick to respond. Beyond the standard, “Were sorry to hear that,” they wanted to get to the bottom of the problem and help solve it. Within a few minutes I received a call from their customer service department to help remedy the issue, and just as quickly, a replacement case shipped out, no questions asked. The issue repeated itself with the second case too, (so clearly there’s a design flaw) but the team at OtterBox remained truly focused on customer service, using social media as a true form of online engagement.

The Bad: Uber. 

To say Uber has given me a headache would be the world’s biggest understatement. After over a year of using Uber, my relationship with them is beginning to mirror that of one with a dysfunctional ex. If I can borrow a description from comedian Aaron Karo, the first six months were bliss, the next three were a little rocky, and the last three have been spent trying not to punch them in the face. Despite leading the evolution in how the world moves, and making cities more accessible, if you’ve got a disability, that’s of little comfort.

How did it get this bad?

Earlier this year, I was partnered with my first service dog, an awesome two-year-old Labrador Retriever. Since then, my experience with Uber has become so increasingly frustrating I wonder if my continued relationship with them is some form of Stockholm Syndrome. 

Not only has it become increasingly common for drivers to adamantly insist they “can’t” accept me as a client due to my service dog, many drivers, as misinformed as they are, claim they are under no obligation to abide by federal law because they use their own vehicles. Nearly 25% of my requested rides have been cancelled by the driver upon arrival simply because they do not want to obey or acknowledge the existence of the ADA. One driver even went as far as to say he would not allow me in his vehicle unless my dog were caged. More and more I am forced to make multiple requests through the Uber app before I am able to complete a trip without incident.

And what, you may be asking is Uber’s response to all this? “This isn’t right and we’re working with our partners to make it better.”

From a social media perspective, Uber, and in particular the DC office, is extremely responsive and engaging on Twitter. With each incident brought to their attention, they promise swift action and follow up, yet, little ever changes. To the Twitterverse it’s outstanding service with a smile, and it registers as good PR. The reality is, time and time again I am left with nothing more than empty promises to do better from a company whose accountability is so lacking they only communicate through social media, e-mail and their respective iPhone and Android apps. All my repeated requests to meet with them in person, or talk in depth with someone with the hope of starting a much needed dialogue on these issues go unheeded, as did my letter to Uber CEO Travis Kalanick. All of this “engagement” amounts to nothing without the action to support it.

So while the debate over the value of social media engagement rages on, this much remains abundantly clear: talk is cheap, actions speak louder than words, and engagement is only as valuable as the motive behind it.

THREE LESSONS BILL COSBY’S LATEST COMEDY SPECIAL TAUGHT ME ABOUT PR

Nearly 30 years since his last televised special, comedy legend Bill Cosby returned to Comedy Central Saturday, November 23, in his latest offering appropriately titled “Far From Finished." At 76, Cosby is perhaps at his best with an arsenal of stories about marriage, changing relationship dynamics, and growing older. With an audience seemingly hanging on his every word, watching a master storyteller at work for 90 minutes was, I realized, not only a great dissection of comedic approach, but a chance to reinforce some great PR lessons as well.

Here are my top three takeaways from watching Dr. Cosby at work:

1). Authenticity Wins Every time

In addition to his genius crafting a funny narrative, Cosby is also well known for keeping his act clean at all times. That’s who he is, and fans everywhere know what they can expect. His personal stories are funny in part because they are unique to him, but he also touches on their universality.

Witnessing first-hand the power of narrative and its potential to grip an audience while tending bar in New York, Cosby had no doubt in his mind that was the style he wanted to emulate.

“I remember thinking, ‘That’s the style I want to go with my writing. Identification and a style that I care,’” recalled Cosby in the post-concert interview accompanying the November 25 DVD release.

“The [comics] who really care know that it’s from the mind down to these fingertips. From that point on, it’s your style,” Cosby continued.

The public can smell inauthenticity a mile away. To succeed, brands must be authentic, know their voice and use it to their advantage. A serious brand suddenly trying to interject humor at the wrong moment can be perceived as disingenuous. On the flip side, brands who have established themselves as risk takers, often pushing boundaries and engaging humorously with the public on an ongoing basis can pay off big time. I’m looking at you, Zappos.

2). Plans Change, Be Flexible

One of the recurring themes that cropped up in the post-concert interview was Cosby’s reliance on his intuition and how trust in both himself and the audience are more often than not the driving force behind his performances.

“When I walk out, there’s not even a rush. I walk out and I look at them, and I hear them, and I reach down and I pick up the mic, put it over the ear, put the [microphone receiver] in my pocket, and I have from that point, no idea what I am going to say. My plan is that I don’t have a plan.

“I don’t try anything out. If it’s funny to me, I’m going to give it to you,” Cosby said of his work style.

Remembering back to “Himself”, Cosby confessed that one of his most beloved routines, “Chocolate Cake For Breakfast” was largely ad-libbed as a result of his trust and connection with the audience at the time that gave him the freedom to let go and have fun.

Likewise, and especially in PR, crises happen and plans will get scrapped. Surprises and the unexpected are part of what PR is about. Seize those opportunities and challenges as they come. Be open to your approach and appreciate fluidity. Understand that the best responses often come from quick adaption and the ability to think on your feet. Remember when the power went out at halftime of the 2012 Superbowl? The marketing team at Oreo was all over it reminding you with a timely PSA that, “You can still dunk in the dark.”

3). Tell A Great Story 

Cosby is a revered storyteller. That is his gift. He takes audiences with him through every tale he tells and despite the diversity of the crowd, they’re all with him as if it’s their own, regardless of their personal connection or understanding. The degrees vary, but everyone finds a way to identify with him. The connection to story is almost automatic. Human nature. Great stories give the opportunity for the listener to create their own unique visuals which instantly lead to better recall. Our memories love visual cues.

On more than one occasion, Cosby said, he was pressured to speed up his delivery. “They said, ‘If you didn’t get them in the first 30 seconds, you will lose them,’” he recounted. What he learned was it wasn’t so much about grabbing their attention, but building trust, and holding it. Getting the audience to go along with him believing the payoff would be worth the wait.

This week, Adweek unveiled its annual list of the most viral ad campaigns. What characteristic did many of the top honorees share? They forewent the traditional length of most ad spots, 15-30 seconds and instead focused on a compelling narrative to grab the public’s attention. It’s no secret that content is shifting away from television and moving toward online and mobile, but as the platform changes, so do the rules. Campaigns that live online are not bound by older decrees where ad length and airtime are financially linked. Online presents brands with an amazing opportunity to tell compelling stories about themselves and their product without breaking the bank for airtime. This year’s best story? Dove’s “Real Beauty Sketches” campaign—a three minute ad—was shared over 4 million times.

Thank you, Bill Cosby for decades of laughs. You’ve made me not only a better comic but a stronger communicator. I owe you a debt of gratitude for inspiring my personal credo: life is all about chasing (and later telling) the great story.

FIVE WAYS EMPLOYERS CAN SUPPORT VETERANS RETURNING TO THE WORKFORCE

No matter the discipline, skill or specialty, all employers look for a handful of ideal traits in new hires: loyalty and passion, the ability to think quickly and adapt in fast-paced environments, and the ability to work collaboratively with teams.

These are characteristics of our nation’s veterans; yet, veterans’ unemployment statistics are only slightly ahead of the national unemployment rate of 7.6%. According to the latest statistics released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate for Post-9/11 Veterans has declined slightly in recent months to 7.2%.   

Despite a strong work ethic and advanced skills and training, it is widely understood that veterans face an uphill battle when reentering the American workforce. Informed employers anticipate these challenges and help smooth the transition from military culture to the workplace.  As veterans shift from a highly-structured, hierarchical organization where routine, chain of command and discipline is vital to success, a more relaxed civilian culture can be disorienting and confusing. 

Here are five things employers can do to make the transition more successful:

1. Provide leadership/managerial training around ways to leverage veterans’ specific skillsets and knowledge to the benefit of the team/company.

2. Proactively identify specific ways veterans’ culture and skillsets can be integrated into existing company culture, and create opportunities for contribution and inclusion from leadership.

3. Create a Veterans Affairs POC within the company that can provide access to different veteran agencies in the area.

4. Create veterans affinity groups across offices and regions to open dialogue and share experiences.

5. Provide a “buddy” system with informed co-workers for organizational transition mentoring and support.

Hiring veterans can, and should be, a priority for employers. Many top firms are already leading the charge. Amazon, for example, boasts 25% of its workforce as veterans. Additionally, AT&T recently launched two unique programs aimed at helping servicemen and women use their skills in the workforce. Not only does hiring veterans offer a win-win on the business side, in the form of tax breaks and employer incentives, it sends a clear positive message that their sacrifice is not forgotten.

The companies who embrace and assist veterans returning to civilian life will increasingly find themselves on the side of positive public perception for doing the right thing. And, more importantly, employers can make Veterans’ Day sentiments a day-to-day reality for our returning service men and women.  

By: Ryan Honick, Fellow, Hill+Knowlton Strategies, Washington D.C. 

This blog post first appeared on Hill+Knowlton Strategies

THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN SURVIVAL GUIDE: WHY LAUGHTER ALWAYS WINS

If you’re not laughing at the government shutdown, you’re doing it wrong.

Yes. I said it.

Some of you will no doubt disagree with me outright that with our federal government shut down and costing our economy an estimated $300 million per day, now is not the time for jokes. Except that humor heals. Humor should overtake baseball as our national pastime. To paraphrase Chandler Bing, funny is all we have. Laughter is the best medicine. Unless of course, you die of laughter. Then, as Joey Tribbiani might remind us, the point is moo.

I digress.

Let’s get real for a second. There’s absolutely nothing funny about 800,000 federal employees being furloughed as a result of the government shutdown. As President Obama pointed out, this shutdown did not need to happen, but it did. Why? Because Republicans suck at math and seem to lack a basic understanding of how laws work. Despite not having the votes in the Senate to do so, they tied their cooperation on passing a Continuing Resolution to the defunding of Obamacare which was a non-starter for Democrats, setting the stage for our nation’s first government shutdown since 1995. If I may borrow a segment from my favorite podcast, Too Beautiful To Live, it’s time to “Shut It Down, America.”

Once the clock struck midnight, my Twitter feed became a barrage of all things shutdown related. “BREAKING: The United States of America” read a tweet from political columnist Sarah Kenzior. The comedy floodgates were open. Comedians (both established and aspiring) began basking in the glistening comedic sun political brinksmanship bestowed upon us—and that—is something that I can enthusiastically get behind.

Ahead of the House of Cards mockup that became the front page of Tuesday morning’s New York Daily News, the fictional Twitter account of Francis J. Underwood reminded us all about the importance of breathing. Buzzfeed took us through the mind of every federal employee gracing us with a message from Heath Ledger’s Joker, and Andrew Siciliano of DirecTV’s Red Zone Channel alerted us that the government was officially listed as ‘questionable’ for Sunday.

Jon Stewart took to the airwaves Monday night likening the Republican threat of a shutdown over Obamcare to the New York Giants threatening to shut down the NFL if they didn’t get 25 additional points following their 31-7 loss to the Kansas City Chiefs last week.

“They didn’t do that. What I am saying is, wouldn’t it be nice if the United States Congress aspired to the maturity and problem-solving capacity of football players?” Stewart said.

Much to the chagrin of Republicans, October 1 saw the on-time launch of the long-awaited health insurance marketplaces open for business as promised, just with a few more glitches than expected. Both President Obama, and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sibelius downplayed the challenges to the user-experience as par for the course given the increase in traffic to healthcare.gov. Obama’s analogy comparing it to the launch of iOS 7 was a bit of a reach, though. Sure, nobody told Apple to stop making the iPhone due to a few bugs, but unlike Obamacare, Americans have a choice to opt out of the iPhone if they don’t like it (without a penalty, I might add), and at least iPhone 5S has a fingerprint scanner. Your move, Obamacare.

I can’t rag too much on Obamacare. After all, I spent two years at HHS educating and informing the public on its key provisions and promoting the healthcare exchanges. That’s why watching Jimmy Kimmel confront a very confused public made me laugh and cry simultaneously. What’s better: The Affordable Care Act, Or Obamacare? Spoiler alert: it’s the same piece of legislation. Worse still, while many agreed that an informed citizenry was an essential part of our democracy, it seems many Kimmel interviewed were in fact, not. Clearly the ACA still has a branding problem.

NPR even had some fun providing single people inside the Beltway with eight can’t miss pickup lines sure to separate the wheat from the chaff in the dating world. “Hey baby, do you not have health insurance? Because you have ’fine’ written all over you.” Zing.

Our friends over at Fox news are living in an entirely different universe altogether, not even acknowledging that the shutdown itself is real. The government isn’t shut down according to Fox, it’s just losing weight, and Sean Hannity is treating the shutdown like Californians treat earthquakes; he just doesn’t quite feel it impacting him, he’s not quite sure what the big deal is, and he’s going about his day as planned.

Nobody can say with any certainty how long the shutdown will last, and while everything that is happening is absolute lunacy, you’ll be much better served by taking the advice of Kevin Spacey’s political alter ego and remembering to breathe normally and appreciate the humor.

DISNEYLAND’S NEW DISABILITY POLICY TREATS EVERYONE THE SAME, FINALLY

“It’s been fun, but I don’t think I need you as a friend anymore.“

That was the single line email I received from my best friend of over 20 years this afternoon when he read about the proposed new rules for disabled guests at Disney Theme Park. Having known him as long as I have, I can say with confidence that I thinkhe was kidding.

The change, sparked in large part by the well-publicized policy abuses from companies like Dream Tours, rolls out October 9 allowing disabled patrons to return to a ride at a designated time—similar to the FastPass system Disney currently makes available to everyone—effectively ending the longtime practice of line-skipping. In other words, they’re finally treating individuals with disabilities like everybody else.

Now, it is true that I will certainly miss what author John Green might call a ”wheelchair perk.“ For many years as a kid growing up in Los Angeles, frequent trips to Disneyland happened. I’m not going to sit here and pretend I didn’t enjoy circling the park multiple times on a given summer afternoon with my friends. However, it’s not all it’s cracked up to be. I’ve offered to trade my disability with anyone who believes the temporary celebrity gained among friends for the day’s outing is worth dealing with other “perks” of being disabled. In my case, excessive fatigue from standing or walking the shortest of distances, attempting to maintain a steady gait while praying silently that I don’t trip, fall, and end up face-to-face greeting the pavement, and enduring awkward stares from passersby in the process who have no idea how much energy (physical and mental) it takes just to get myself from point A to point B. Not surprisingly, nobody has taken me up on it.

As a kid, I found out who my real friends were rather quickly. There were those who hung out with me all the time, and those who invited me out just ahead of their trip to Disneyland. The only difference was, despite my entrepreneurial spirit from an early age, I didn’t have the chutzpah or damaged frontal lobe required to charge the latter for an afternoon of riding roller coasters. I also had no desire to punch my ticket to Hell before I was even old enough to see an R-rated movie.

People with disabilities of varying degrees are often accused of "gaming the system” by the ignorant and uninformed whose schema of disability they don’t fit into. Accommodations of any sort are offered in an attempt to level the playing field, and because Federal law prohibits asking for specifics on an individual’s given disability there will always be those who take advantage of these safeguards who shouldn’t. Regardless, Disney is right to try and rectify abuses with their new policy. The only question in my mind is, “What took so long?”

Of course none of this would even be an issue if the park had accessible lines to begin with, but that’s another story altogether.

STARBUCKS CEO HOWARD SCHULTZ’S OPEN LETTER IS MEANINGLESS

Dear Mr. Schultz,

Long ago I was taught not to kick somebody when they’re down. So, naturally I’m obligated to lift you up prior to taking you to task for your recent open letter concerning Starbucks’ gun policies to coffee snobs everywhere. So be it.

Mr. Schultz, I love your coffee. Starbucks offers premium quality coffee at affordable prices. De-lish. Every day, I visit a nearby Starbucks location comically testing out new aliases to see if I can catch an unsuspecting barista off-guard. I confess, I’m addicted.Starbucks is my mistress, and I know I’m not alone.

I have a love-love relationship with all of your baristas who energetically mix whatever Frappuccino concoction I feel like trying off of the ever-expanding Starbucks Secret Menu with a smile while simultaneously asking where I got the idea to blend my Java Chip with Cinnamon Dolce and Toffee Nut syrup. Putting aside the inconsistencies with how much I’m charged from store-to-store or even barista-to-barista for the same drink, or the lack of disability friendly access and seating at the vast majority of locations I’ve been to here in D.C., the effort that goes into making Starbucks that elusive “third place” you strive for is paying off.

Having said that, your open letter published this morning by The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, and The Wall Street Journal among others is appreciated, but ultimately meaningless. In the wake of Monday’s events at Navy Yard it’s certainly timely, and I would argue, politically motivated. There have been numerous occasions for you to voice your concern, yet you waited. The truth is, a polite request like this will fall on deaf ears. Even worse, so would an outright ban assuming you were willing to enforce it, which you made clear you are not.  If someone lawfully or otherwise wants to enter your store with a gun, they will. That won’t change. 

On the subject of respecting “open carry” laws, I’m reminded of the lyrics from Chris Rock’s 1999 No Sex In The Champagne Room where he muses, “Don’t go to parties with metal detectors. Sure it feels safe inside, but what about everyone else waiting outside with guns? They know you don’t have one.” I am not by any stretch of the imagination a card-carrying member of the NRA, but I do know that for many people, particularly in states where open carry is permitted, the desire to feel safe will trump the need for a daily caffeine fix every time. 

You are correct that no action you take will satisfy everyone. Social media has already erupted in backlash, but that was bound to happen no matter what position you took. However, walking the line on this issue with a polite request of this sort seems disingenuous at best and politically motivated at worst. Take a stand, Mr. Schultz. Pick either side of the fence, just don’t sit on it.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, my Frappuccino is waiting.