reasonable accommodations

Senator John Fetterman And Reasonable Accommodations In The Workplace

Superfluous documentation leads to a multitude of challenges; unnecessary disclosure, lack of privacy, wasted time, and expending of energy that could be better spent performing the job rather than fighting to prove ourselves as both disabled and worthy of employment simultaneously. 

“I do think that John Fetterman—his example personally, and the example the Senate is setting—will be really helpful to a lot of people,” says Maria Town, President and CEO of the American Association of People with Disabilities. “It’s going to take many, many people, both people with disabilities and non-disabled people, actually saying, ‘Okay, we can make this happen in our workplace, in our church, in our community centers.'”
Mini Racker, Time Inc.

When Senator Fetterman was elected last fall, it was a victory not only for the residents of Pennsylvania, but for the disability community as well. Voters saw John Fetterman for the qualified candidate he was; dismissing ableist attitudes that called his fitness to serve into question simply because he required reasonable accommodations to do his job. Like Senator Duckworth, he is quickly becoming the advocate so many of us are thankful for—and a daily reminder of why representation is so crucial.

The Senate is moving quickly to adapt to the needs of its newest disabled freshman Senator, which is laudable, especially for an institution not well-known for its expediency. Captioning screens are being installed, accommodations are being made for his use of a wireless tablet, and the Sergeant at Arms is working closely with Senator Fetterman to ensure he has what he needs to succeed in the workplace.
 
However, since most of us are not members of Congress, the battle for workplace accommodations can often be more taxing and challenging. Accepting a new role becomes far more than finding the right position, but also the right employer willing to provide accommodations in an easy and straightforward way. Ideally, a conversation around our needs would be simple, but it’s often not. Employers frequently require those seeking accommodations jump through various hoops that often demoralize and ultimately dissuade our use of accommodations in the first place.

Many employers require not just proof of a disability, but a doctor’s blessing that the accommodation is warranted despite the EEOC clearly articulating that such things are not required if a disability is obvious or established. Superfluous documentation leads to a multitude of challenges; unnecessary disclosure, lack of privacy, wasted time, and expending of energy that could be better spent performing the job rather than fighting to prove ourselves as both disabled and worthy of employment simultaneously.

Complicating matters, most employers will not grant accommodations as a condition of employment, thereby leaving perspective hires in a state of limbo and considerable risk when deciding whether or not to join an organization. Even our nation’s largest employer—the federal government—begins the interactive process for reasonable accommodations only after an employee has onboarded.

Thank you to Senator Fetterman and the countless advocates working to normalize workplace accommodations.

Representation matters.

The Ableist Discourse Around John Fetterman’s Stroke

“What is so harmful about seeing what's happened to John Fetterman is that he's actually experiencing what many disabled people experience every day when we ask for accommodations,” Maria Town, President and CEO of American Association of People with Disabilities added, “which is an instant doubt of our competence and a questioning about whether, you know, ‘Can you really do this job?’”
-David Mack, BuzzFeed

Watching John Fetterman’s interview with Dasha Burns of NBC News highlighted in real-time how pervasive ableism is in our culture. In a tight senate race that should be focused on issues, Burns chose instead to emphasize Fetterman’s need for accommodations, questioning his fitness for office over a chance to spotlight policy during a prime-time interview Tuesday night.

For his part, Lester Holt introduced the segment calling it, “Not your typical candidate interview,” placing additional focus on Fetterman’s disability.

NBC is clearly gunning for the #NDEAM Awards.

Burns has since backtracked saying, “Our reporting did not and should not comment on fitness for office. This is for voters to decide.” Voters are persuaded by news coverage, and as a journalist, her coverage irresponsibly perpetuated myths surrounding the competence of disabled people seeking employment, particularly when reasonable accommodations are involved.

Adding fuel to the fire were Burns’ additional queries surrounding Fetterman’s health, implying the medical documentation supplied by his team was outdated and asking, “Don't voters deserve to know your status now?” While voters have become accustomed to candidates running for high political office releasing medical records, there are no established norms concerning what those records should include. The one constant for disabled job seekers is that we are routinely asked to provide information and documentation far above that of our non-disabled colleagues simply to prove fitness, both for the job and any related accommodations.

Barriers are constantly placed in front of us to to earn our place at the table. Those barriers are difficult to overcome with Implicit biases about disabled people being incredibly pervasive. A 2007 study led by Brian Nosek, a Professor of Psychology at University of Virginia found "[p]reference for people without disability compared to people with disabilities was among the strongest implicit and explicit effects across the social group domains" with only age showing more implicit bias. Significantly, 76 percent of respondents showed an implicit preference for people without disabilities, compared to nine percent for people with disabilities." NBC put those biases front and center for a national audience.

Thankfully media personalities like Comedy Central/The Daily Show host Trevor N. aren’t afraid to call out ableism. We need more allies like him. His impending departure leaves big shoes to fill.

#disability #politics #employment

Action over Optics During NDEAM

Dawn Gibson, Christina Miller, and April Thompson

Dawn Gibson, Christina Miller, and April Thompson

We’re less than a week into National Disability Employment Awareness Month. The stories of companies talking about the value of diversity, equity, inclusion, and access are everywhere. The truth that far too many of us in the disability community know however, is that for many of them, the goal is optics over action. Looking past the check-the-box mentality employed by so many and digging deeper we recognize awareness of disability employment (or the lack of it) is not really the issue. Apathy and indifference, however, are rampant.

-A woman went viral on TikTok after exposing her employer for not accommodating her for her dyslexia and ADHD, The Daily Dot reports.

-A worker with a back condition was fired from Virginia-based Resource Metrix after she requested an ergonomic chair, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, in a story published by The News & Observer Publishing Company.

-Walt Disney World, is under fire after a Cast Member took them to task in a public Facebook/Meta post for refusing to accommodate her Cerebral Palsy.

These are not isolated instances. Rather, they represent a small fraction of the injustices faced by disabled people in the workplace every day. Further, they underscore what can often feel like a Sisyphean task for the disabled community. Not only do we struggle to find employment, but due to a lack of employer empathy and understanding around reasonable accommodations, we struggle to keep it.

To combat the stigma, many of us don’t disclose, opting instead to work without accommodations and subsequently struggle to perform. Paradoxically, this often leads to being fired, perpetuating the myth that disabled people aren’t cut out for gainful employment. All of this while we watch leadership in our organization tout disability awareness and inclusion from the rooftops.

Meanwhile, the effects of long COVID continue impacting the workforce.

Up to 4 million people are estimated to be out of work because of long COVID symptoms, according to The Brookings Institution's August report.

Between Sept. 14 and Sept. 26, more than one in four adults with long COVID reported significant limitations on day-to-day activities, per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data.

The number jumps closer to 40% for respondents who are Black, Latino or disabled — three groups disproportionately affected by the pandemic.

Employers must do better providing accommodations for employees. 1). It’s the law. 2) As the disability population increases, the demand for them will skyrocket. There’s no turning back and employers need to brace for that eventuality.

Our unique perspectives solve organizational challenges, they don’t create them.

H/t Fiona Lowenstein of Business Insider for this resource.

How to ask for ADA health accommodations at your job, according to 5 workers who have

#leadership #work #disabilityawareness #ndeam #resonableaccommodations #deia #disability