Why ADA Compliance Doesn't Always Mean Accessibility

Wheelchair users are seen in the Rose Garden at the White House as President Biden delivers remarks during an ADA celebration.

For the vast majority of my life I've navigated the intricate maze of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Designed to ensure equal access for all, the ADA has been instrumental in ensuring the rights of disabled people. Yet, in practice, the reality often falls short of the promise. Julie Reiskin, a fellow wheelchair user, captured this sentiment perfectly, telling USA TODAY, "It would be really nice if I could look at a website and have reliable information."

This disparity between expectation and reality isn't just about websites. It extends to physical spaces too. For instance, booking an ADA-compliant hotel room might promise a slightly bigger bathroom, but what's the use if I can't even enter the room due to a heavy door or lack of actuators? This isn't just an inconvenience; it's a barrier that hinders true accessibility.

My personal experiences mirror those of many others in the disability community. Just this summer, I voiced my concerns about a local Starbucks, a place I've frequented for nearly a decade. Their response? They were "in compliance with the ADA." But true access goes beyond mere compliance. Deborah Laufer's journey, involving over 600 cases filed for similar reasons, and now a pending Supreme Court of the U.S. case remarked, "I sometimes ended up sleeping in my car because I could not get an accessible room at a hotel."

The crux of the matter is that the ADA should be viewed as a starting point, not the end goal. True accessibility and inclusion mean going beyond the minimum requirements. As Shira Wakschlag of The Arc of the United States emphasized to Disability Scoop, "ADA testers are essential to ensuring the rights of people with disabilities are enforced and protected."

In our quest for a more inclusive world, let's not just aim for the floor; let's reach for the ceiling. Let's not just be compliant; let's be truly accessible.

Following the Supreme Court overturning of affirmative action earlier this summer, many disability advocates, myself included, expressed concerns about the ADA being next on the chopping block. Sadly, it looks as though our fears were not unfounded.

I invite you to join the conversation, share your experiences, and together, let's push for a world where accessibility is not just a legal requirement but a heartfelt commitment.

'Sleeping in my car.' This Supreme Court case could change how disabled Americans book hotel rooms

The ADA Under Siege? What the Supreme Court’s Latest Ruling Means for Disability Rights

A pull quote from Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, “it would be deeply unfortunate if the Equal Protection Clause actually demanded this perverse, ahistorical, and counterproductive outcome.”

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to overturn race-conscious admissions in colleges has left me, as a disability advocate, deeply concerned. The ruling, which challenges affirmative action, makes me wonder: What does this mean for other minority groups, especially the disabled community?

With this ruling, the Supreme Court continues its historic march backward on civil rights; seemingly hellbent on taking them all back piece by piece.

Will Hild of Consumers'​ Research told The Washington Post the ruling “will put the wind in the sails of groups like ours, who want to get the woke, racially based hiring and promotion schemes out of corporate America.” This statement raises alarm bells. If the court is willing to challenge affirmative action, is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) next?

Furthermore, Hild mentions that legal precedents allowing race-conscious admissions have been a “fig leaf” for private sector diversity initiatives. With this ruling, he predicts a “free-for-all on pushing back against that.” This suggests that the ruling could embolden challenges to diversity initiatives across the board, including those aimed at disability inclusion.

In a scorching dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that “the devastating impact of this decision cannot be overstated.” She added that the decision “cements a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote in her dissent that “it would be deeply unfortunate if the Equal Protection Clause actually demanded this perverse, ahistorical, and counterproductive outcome.”

The ADA has been a cornerstone for disability rights, ensuring equal opportunities for people like me. I am one of the 61 million disabled adults in the United States. As a wheelchair user and service dog handler to Canine Companions® Pico, the ADA has been instrumental in my life. But this ruling might embolden groups to challenge not just racial diversity but diversity as a whole.

We must remain vigilant and proactive. The progress we’ve made in disability rights is monumental, but it’s also fragile. We must ensure that this ruling does not become a precedent for eroding the protections that the ADA provides.

As we enter Disability Pride Month, as we celebrate Independence Day, we must not become complacent. I urge you all to stay informed, engage in discussions, and stand up for the rights of all minority groups. Our diversity is our strength. Let’s protect it.

#DisabilityRights #SupremeCourt #ADA #ProtectDiversity #AffirmativeAction #SCOTUS #CivilRights #StayInformed #EngageInChange #DEI #DEIA #DisabilityPride