Senator John Fetterman And Reasonable Accommodations In The Workplace

Superfluous documentation leads to a multitude of challenges; unnecessary disclosure, lack of privacy, wasted time, and expending of energy that could be better spent performing the job rather than fighting to prove ourselves as both disabled and worthy of employment simultaneously. 

“I do think that John Fetterman—his example personally, and the example the Senate is setting—will be really helpful to a lot of people,” says Maria Town, President and CEO of the American Association of People with Disabilities. “It’s going to take many, many people, both people with disabilities and non-disabled people, actually saying, ‘Okay, we can make this happen in our workplace, in our church, in our community centers.'”
Mini Racker, Time Inc.

When Senator Fetterman was elected last fall, it was a victory not only for the residents of Pennsylvania, but for the disability community as well. Voters saw John Fetterman for the qualified candidate he was; dismissing ableist attitudes that called his fitness to serve into question simply because he required reasonable accommodations to do his job. Like Senator Duckworth, he is quickly becoming the advocate so many of us are thankful for—and a daily reminder of why representation is so crucial.

The Senate is moving quickly to adapt to the needs of its newest disabled freshman Senator, which is laudable, especially for an institution not well-known for its expediency. Captioning screens are being installed, accommodations are being made for his use of a wireless tablet, and the Sergeant at Arms is working closely with Senator Fetterman to ensure he has what he needs to succeed in the workplace.
 
However, since most of us are not members of Congress, the battle for workplace accommodations can often be more taxing and challenging. Accepting a new role becomes far more than finding the right position, but also the right employer willing to provide accommodations in an easy and straightforward way. Ideally, a conversation around our needs would be simple, but it’s often not. Employers frequently require those seeking accommodations jump through various hoops that often demoralize and ultimately dissuade our use of accommodations in the first place.

Many employers require not just proof of a disability, but a doctor’s blessing that the accommodation is warranted despite the EEOC clearly articulating that such things are not required if a disability is obvious or established. Superfluous documentation leads to a multitude of challenges; unnecessary disclosure, lack of privacy, wasted time, and expending of energy that could be better spent performing the job rather than fighting to prove ourselves as both disabled and worthy of employment simultaneously.

Complicating matters, most employers will not grant accommodations as a condition of employment, thereby leaving perspective hires in a state of limbo and considerable risk when deciding whether or not to join an organization. Even our nation’s largest employer—the federal government—begins the interactive process for reasonable accommodations only after an employee has onboarded.

Thank you to Senator Fetterman and the countless advocates working to normalize workplace accommodations.

Representation matters.

Is Long COVID Considered to Be a Disability in the Workplace?

Thank you Brandi Fowler and LinkedIn News for the opportunity to talk about the affects of Long Covid in the workplace and its impact on the disability community. These are important conversations and folks living with Long Covid should be aware of their rights under the ADA.

#WorkplaceCulture #ReasonableAccomodations #Covid #Disabilities #DisabilityRights #DisabilityAdvocate #Disability #LongCovid #LinkedinNews

https://lnkd.in/ev2vqFBv

How The Twitter Layoffs Affect The Disability Community

The Twitter Logo with the quote “Twitter can not become the de facto Town Square Musk envisions at the expense of the accessibility that once made it great.” Attributed to Ryan Honick

The Twitter Logo with the quote “Twitter can not become the de facto Town Square Musk envisions at the expense of the accessibility that once made it great.” Attributed to Ryan Honick

If users want to emphasize how important the continued prioritization of accessibility actually is, we need to lean into one of the best parts about Twitter: how easy it makes it to amplify a cause.
-Alexa Heinrich, Adweek

For many disabled activists, Twitter has long been a place to connect, amplify, and create change. I owe much to a platform that allowed all of that to happen. Conversations with one-time virtual strangers turned into lifelong friends and allies, virtually and otherwise. The platform was never perfect, and detractors abound, but advocacy always faces pushback. Still, Twitter served as an important space where many found community and support as well as a direct line to key influencers; from journalists and brands to celebrities. Twitter was the first social network where it seemed accessibility was its foundation—in more ways than one.

Prior to layoffs, The Accessibility Experience Team was working on myriad projects focused on improving the user experience. For folks with visual disabilities, the team revamped its icons and automated reminders for the use of alt-text. The deaf community saw improvements with captions, and for those with sensory sensitivities Twitter updated its app sounds.

Unfortunately, all of that progress is poised to stop as Musk looks for ways to improve profitability following a number of high-profile advertisers rethinking their relationship with the platform. Companies including General Mills, Oreo company maker Mondelēz International and Pfizer Inc., have temporarily paused their Twitter advertising, according to The Wall Street Journal.

That pressure, coming from groups like Color Of Change, Free Press, the Anti-Defamation League, and GLAAD is the result of Musk haphazardly cutting teams dedicated to diversity, equity, inclusion, and access.

“We are witnessing the real-time destruction of one of the world’s most powerful communications systems,” Nicole Gill director of Accountable Tech told MarketWatch.

Sandra Sucher, a professor of management at Harvard University, told The New York Times Twitter’s cuts were among the most poorly handled that she had seen.

Speaking at an investment conference in New York Friday, Musk said: “Our goal is with Twitter, how do we get 80% of the public to join a digital town square and voice their opinion and exchange ideas and once in a while change their mind?”

With his latest actions, Musk is deliberately leaving out the 20% of the population with disabilities, setting Twitter up to become yet another inaccessible space where disabled people find ourselves unwelcome. Twitter can not become the de facto Town Square Musk envisions at the expense of the accessibility that once made it great.

Return to Office Policies Will Hurt The Disabled Workforce

The quote "No employee should be forced to choose between career advancement and their health where an accommodation exists to mitigate roadblocks." in all caps white lettering behind a faded background of a workstation with a chair and laptop.

The quote "No employee should be forced to choose between career advancement and their health where an accommodation exists to mitigate roadblocks." in all caps white lettering behind a faded background of a workstation with a chair and laptop.

“Remote work and remote-work options are something that our community has been advocating for for decades, and it’s a little frustrating that for decades corporate America was saying it’s too complicated, we’ll lose productivity, and now suddenly it’s like, sure, let’s do it,” said Charles-Edouard CATHERINE, director of corporate and government relations for the National Organization on Disability.
Ben Casselman, The New York Times

A global pandemic made telework necessary. Nobody thought twice about it once the non-disabled workforce was threatened. At USPTO, an agency renowned for its telework program, I was initially asked to provide additional medical documentation in support of my request to modify my telework schedule as the pandemic emerged. Only after the pandemic was declared a national emergency was that request deemed superfluous.

Remote work remains a major victory for the disabled community and we are grateful for the attitudinal shift. As the New York Times points out, the increase in telework is a boon for disabled workers. A newly released study led by Adam Ozimek, Chief Economist at the Economic Innovation Group, found more than 35 percent of disabled Americans ages 18 to 64 had jobs in September. That was up from 31 percent just before the pandemic and is a record in the 15 years the government has kept track.

As long COVID continues to impact the workforce, telework represents a vital support system of opportunity. There were 1.05 million more disabled working-age Americans in August 2022 compared to January 2020, according to data compiled by Richard Deitz, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Axios reports.

However, despite the enormous win of telework, societally, we have short memories. The return to office efforts many companies are pushing highlights the all-too-pervasive ableist attitudes of many employers. The recent The Wall Street Journal article “The New Rules For Getting Face Time at the Office” notes that while adjustments are being made to accommodate the hybrid nature of pandemic work, there remains an unfair advantage for in-office workers.

“It’s all about being more salient in the boss’s mind,” Jeffrey Pfeffer professor of organizational behavior at Stanford University Graduate School of Business, told WSJ. “Whether it’s fair, you’re increasing your chances of landing high-profile assignments, raises and promotions, simply because your name pops into the heads of those making decisions.”

This divide ultimately leads to disabled employees feeling like second-class citizens in our own jobs. No employee should be forced to choose between career advancement and their health where an accommodation exists to mitigate roadblocks. Leadership needs to make concerted efforts to engage employees and provide equal opportunity regardless of where the work is being done.

Disability and Disclosure in the. Workplace

Ryan Honick wearing a sky blue dress shirt, red tie, glasses, and headphones presents via Zoom to members of MGMI about reasonable accommodations and disability disclosure in the workplace on 10.22.22

Ryan Honick wearing a sky blue dress shirt, red tie, glasses, and headphones presents via Zoom to members of MGMI about reasonable accommodations and disability disclosure in the workplace on 10.22.22

A huge thank you to Susan Woolner, Lisa Gigliotti, and everyone at the Michigan Chapter of Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, Inc. for the opportunity to present this morning on navigating disability and reasonable accommodations in the workplace. An incredibly important conversation during #NDEAM and beyond.

Event Recap: Diversability Unplugged: Disability and Ableism in the Workplace

Event Recap: Diversability Unplugged: Disability and Ableism in the Workplace

Thank you to Tiffany A. Yu, MSc, Whitney Bailey, katherine lewis, Arielle Dance, PhD and the team at Diversability® for inviting me to speak on Disability and Ableism in the workplace for #ndeam. An evening of thought-provoking discussion and insights with powerhouse panelists Jacob Levy, Lusik Gasparyan, JD, RBT and Angela Fowler.

If you missed it, the recap and recording are now live!

Event Recap: Diversability Unplugged: Disability and Ableism in the Workplace

#workplace #hiring #disabilityAwareness #Disability #Ableism #disabilityInclusion #DEIA #DEI #ReasonableAccommodations

The Ableist Discourse Around John Fetterman’s Stroke

“What is so harmful about seeing what's happened to John Fetterman is that he's actually experiencing what many disabled people experience every day when we ask for accommodations,” Maria Town, President and CEO of American Association of People with Disabilities added, “which is an instant doubt of our competence and a questioning about whether, you know, ‘Can you really do this job?’”
-David Mack, BuzzFeed

Watching John Fetterman’s interview with Dasha Burns of NBC News highlighted in real-time how pervasive ableism is in our culture. In a tight senate race that should be focused on issues, Burns chose instead to emphasize Fetterman’s need for accommodations, questioning his fitness for office over a chance to spotlight policy during a prime-time interview Tuesday night.

For his part, Lester Holt introduced the segment calling it, “Not your typical candidate interview,” placing additional focus on Fetterman’s disability.

NBC is clearly gunning for the #NDEAM Awards.

Burns has since backtracked saying, “Our reporting did not and should not comment on fitness for office. This is for voters to decide.” Voters are persuaded by news coverage, and as a journalist, her coverage irresponsibly perpetuated myths surrounding the competence of disabled people seeking employment, particularly when reasonable accommodations are involved.

Adding fuel to the fire were Burns’ additional queries surrounding Fetterman’s health, implying the medical documentation supplied by his team was outdated and asking, “Don't voters deserve to know your status now?” While voters have become accustomed to candidates running for high political office releasing medical records, there are no established norms concerning what those records should include. The one constant for disabled job seekers is that we are routinely asked to provide information and documentation far above that of our non-disabled colleagues simply to prove fitness, both for the job and any related accommodations.

Barriers are constantly placed in front of us to to earn our place at the table. Those barriers are difficult to overcome with Implicit biases about disabled people being incredibly pervasive. A 2007 study led by Brian Nosek, a Professor of Psychology at University of Virginia found "[p]reference for people without disability compared to people with disabilities was among the strongest implicit and explicit effects across the social group domains" with only age showing more implicit bias. Significantly, 76 percent of respondents showed an implicit preference for people without disabilities, compared to nine percent for people with disabilities." NBC put those biases front and center for a national audience.

Thankfully media personalities like Comedy Central/The Daily Show host Trevor N. aren’t afraid to call out ableism. We need more allies like him. His impending departure leaves big shoes to fill.

#disability #politics #employment