Remote Work Isn’t a Perk—It’s a Lifeline for Disabled Federal Employees

People walking past the Department of the Treasury building, a historic structure with large columns and engraved signage, on a chilly day with some leaves scattered on the ground.

For more than a decade as a federal employee, I’ve been proud to serve the public. I’ve earned awards, glowing reviews, and built a career I love. But here’s the truth: my success wouldn’t have been possible without telework. As a disabled professional managing multiple disabilities, remote work is more than a convenience—it’s a lifeline. It enables me to thrive in an environment that meets my needs and eliminates barriers that might otherwise exclude me. Now, all of that progress is at risk.

The Wall Street Journal's John McCormick and Te-Ping Chen report on the newly envisioned Department of Government Efficiency effort to mandate full-time in-office work is alarming. Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, leading this charge, have made it clear that they expect resignations, with Ramaswamy predicting as many as 25% of federal workers could leave. To them, this might sound like trimming bureaucracy. In practice, this is a targeted assault on equity and inclusion.

Telework gave disabled employees the chance to participate in record numbers, eliminating barriers like long commutes and inaccessible environments. Meg O'Connell, PHR of Global Disability Inclusion, LLC explained it best to HR Brew ™️'s Kristen Parisi: “People with disabilities have what they need in their homes. They don’t have to ask for accommodation [because] they’ve already built out their space.” Why dismantle a system that works?

While many argue in-person work fosters collaboration, the private sector is proving otherwise. Glassdoor’s CEO Christian Sutherland-Wong told Fortune, “The biggest benefit we’ve seen…is being able to tap into talent all around the U.S. and the globe.” If companies like Glassdoor see remote work as a future-driven solution, why is the government pushing outdated practices?

This isn’t just about where we work; it’s about who gets to work. Forcing disabled employees back into offices undermines principles of diversity, equity, inclusion, and access. Policies like DOGE’s mandate send a clear message: “We don’t trust you or value your contributions unless we see you at a desk.” As Dannie Lynn Fountain, DBA, EA, SPHR, CDR of Google said, these practices are “still disability discrimination.”

The pandemic proved remote work’s transformative potential. It shattered barriers for disabled workers and redefined productivity. Now, that progress is being reversed. The stakes couldn’t be higher—not just for me but for all of us. Are we building workplaces of the future or clinging to systems that exclude?

Remote work empowered me to thrive, but it also redefined what’s possible for our workforce. Let’s not let fear of change erase that progress. Inclusion is more than a checkbox; it’s a commitment to creating workplaces where everyone can succeed.

Musk, Ramaswamy Want Federal Workers in the Office Full Time. There’s a Hitch.

Navigating the Ableist Undertones of the Return-to-Office Movement

Two men in suits, sit across from each other at a conference table for a meeting.

October, a month dedicated to raising awareness about disability employment, has always been pivotal. But this year, it’s underscored by a concerning trend in the corporate world: the push to return to the office.

A recent article in Fortune by Paige McGlauflin and Joseph Abrams highlighted a startling reality: "90% [of CEOs] plan to reward those who work in person with favorable assignments, raises, and promotions.” This approach, while seemingly a strategic move to revitalize in-office culture, casts a shadow of exclusion over the disability community, particularly when we’ve seen the positive impact remote work has had on disability employment.

Since becoming full-time remote in 2020, I’ve experienced firsthand the energy conservation, reduced chronic pain, and enhanced focus that comes with remote work. It's not just a convenience; it's a necessity for many of us in the disabled community.

The pandemic brought an unexpected boon for us, enabling more disabled individuals to participate in the labor market effectively. But the current push for physical presence in the office, especially when tied to career progression, is not just a step backward; it’s a leap.

Julie Kratz, in her insightful Forbes article, emphasizes the importance of “practicing everyday acts of inclusion, shifting your language, getting respectfully curious, and staying committed to allyship long-term” But where does penalizing remote work fit into this inclusivity?

The disability community is not a monolith. Our needs, capabilities, and contributions are as diverse as we are. We’ve navigated a world that often forgets us, innovating and adapting, but the message sent by rewarding physical presence is clear: our efforts, adaptability, and skills are second to our ability to be present in the office.

It’s time to challenge this narrative. Let’s foster a dialogue that pushes companies to recognize value beyond physical presence, ensuring that disabled employees are not relegated to second-class citizenship in our own jobs.

CEOs are so desperate for a return to office that they’ll give employees who come back raises, promotions

Celebrating Universal Design and Inclusion at GitLab

Ryan Honick Presents to the GitLab team on the 33rd anniversary of the ADA

Today marks the 33rd anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a landmark legislation that has transformed the lives of millions of Americans. Today, I had the distinct honor of speaking at GitLab on this significant day. Our discussion revolved around the benefits of universal design and remote work in fostering more inclusive and welcoming environments for employees of all abilities.

The conversation was vibrant, engaging, and insightful. I am profoundly grateful to the team at GitLab for inviting me to speak on such crucial topics during Disability Pride Month, and particularly on the anniversary of the ADA. It is through such dialogues that we continue the legacy and vital work of the ADA, ensuring equal opportunities for everyone to thrive in the workplace and beyond.

The passion of the GitLab team was palpable. They are committed to creating an environment where all employees can thrive and succeed. They understand that true inclusion happens when conversations about diversity and disability become the norm, not the exception. When we bring these discussions out of the shadows, we dismantle the stigma and shame often associated with disability. We create a space where people feel empowered to share their stories and experiences, enriching us all.

Normalizing these conversations is a step towards a more inclusive society. It allows us to recognize and appreciate the unique perspectives we each bring to the table, and understand how disability can impact us in ways we may not realize.

I am deeply thankful to GitLab for this opportunity. Their leadership's passion for these discussions is evident, and it's a reminder that change truly starts from the top. I hope that these conversations continue not just during Disability Pride Month, but throughout the year. They are daily discussions that need to happen. They are crucial to our success as individuals, as a society, and as a workforce.

I want to express my gratitude to GitLab for today's opportunity to discuss these important topics. Let's continue to bring these conversations to the forefront, not just today, but every day of the year.

The Remote Work Revolution: A Catalyst for Change in Disability Law

Photo of a young woman who is working from her home office, having the cutest and the cuddliest assistant - her pet dog.

As we celebrate Disability Pride Month, let’s talk about the seismic shift in the world of work - The Remote Work Revolution - and its impact on disability law.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a game-changer. It has shown us that remote work is not only possible but can be highly effective. But did you know that this has also been influencing disability law?

According to a Bloomberg Law review from Robert Iafolla, employers who denied requests for telework as a disability accommodation used to prevail in nearly 70% of federal court rulings pre-pandemic. However, post-pandemic, this dropped to nearly 60%! 📉

Nicole Buonocore Porter, a disability law scholar at Chicago Kent College of Law stated, “Scholars and advocates had hoped the pandemic would have moved the needle more.” She emphasized that courts need to stop “too readily deferring to whatever the employer says.”

So, what does this mean for employees with disabilities?

It means that the collective experience of remote work during the pandemic is slowly changing perceptions. The notion that in-person attendance is always essential is being challenged. 🤔

However, we still have a long way to go. Many judges continue to apply a de facto presumption against allowing remote working, often siding with employers who insist on in-person attendance.

But here’s the kicker - the U.S. Department of Labor and the Job Accommodation Network announced in May that nearly half of workplace accommodations can be implemented at no cost to employers. This includes remote work!

As a disability advocate and someone who has personally benefited from remote work, I believe it’s high time that we embrace this revolution. Let’s work toward creating inclusive work environments that recognize the diverse needs of all employees.

Covid’s Remote Work Experience Is Slowly Changing Disability Law

From Inclusion to Exclusion: The Impact of Remote Work Reduction on Disabled Employees

A desktop computer sitting on top of a wooden desk.

As we navigate the post-pandemic world, many companies, including Farmers Insurance Group, Meta, The Walt Disney Company, Lyft, and Amazon, are scaling back remote work options. This decision, while seemingly benign, has profound implications for employees with disabilities.

The shift to remote work during the pandemic was a boon for many disabled employees. It eliminated commuting challenges, provided a comfortable work environment, and offered flexibility for medical appointments. The rollback of remote work threatens to undo these gains, potentially pushing disabled employees out of the workforce.

Meta's recent decision to require employees to return to the office three days a week starting in September is a case in point. A Meta spokesperson stated, "We're committed to distributed work, and we're confident people can make a meaningful impact both from the office and at home." However, the decision to limit remote work options contradicts this statement, particularly for disabled employees for whom "home" is not just a convenience, but a necessity.

Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's CEO, hinted at this change when he said that their internal analysis showed engineers who work in person "get more done." This perspective, while potentially valid for some, fails to consider the unique circumstances of disabled employees. For them, the ability to work remotely isn't about productivity alone; it's about accessibility and inclusion.

The scaling back of remote work options by these major companies sends a disheartening message to disabled employees: our needs are secondary. It's a stark reminder that the corporate world still has a long way to go in truly embracing diversity and inclusion.

We must advocate for a more inclusive approach to work arrangements, one that recognizes the unique needs and contributions of all employees, including those with disabilities.

Remote work should not be seen as a temporary pandemic measure, but as a permanent option that can foster a more diverse and inclusive workforce.

A New CEO Says Employees Can’t Work Remotely After All, and They Revolt

Spastic Chatter: Episode 90 Disability Humor, Employment, & More

Thank you Whitney Bailey for the opportunity to join Spastic Chatter. What a fun and honest deep dive into all things Cerebral Palsy and quite the kickoff for 2023!

Return to Office Policies Will Hurt The Disabled Workforce

The quote "No employee should be forced to choose between career advancement and their health where an accommodation exists to mitigate roadblocks." in all caps white lettering behind a faded background of a workstation with a chair and laptop.

“Remote work and remote-work options are something that our community has been advocating for for decades, and it’s a little frustrating that for decades corporate America was saying it’s too complicated, we’ll lose productivity, and now suddenly it’s like, sure, let’s do it,” said Charles-Edouard CATHERINE, director of corporate and government relations for the National Organization on Disability.
—Ben Casselman, The New York Times

A global pandemic made telework necessary. Nobody thought twice about it once the non-disabled workforce was threatened. At USPTO, an agency renowned for its telework program, I was initially asked to provide additional medical documentation in support of my request to modify my telework schedule as the pandemic emerged. Only after the pandemic was declared a national emergency was that request deemed superfluous.

Remote work remains a major victory for the disabled community and we are grateful for the attitudinal shift. As the New York Times points out, the increase in telework is a boon for disabled workers. A newly released study led by Adam Ozimek, Chief Economist at the Economic Innovation Group, found more than 35 percent of disabled Americans ages 18 to 64 had jobs in September. That was up from 31 percent just before the pandemic and is a record in the 15 years the government has kept track.

As long COVID continues to impact the workforce, telework represents a vital support system of opportunity. There were 1.05 million more disabled working-age Americans in August 2022 compared to January 2020, according to data compiled by Richard Deitz, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Axios reports.

However, despite the enormous win of telework, societally, we have short memories. The return to office efforts many companies are pushing highlights the all-too-pervasive ableist attitudes of many employers. The recent The Wall Street Journal article “The New Rules For Getting Face Time at the Office” notes that while adjustments are being made to accommodate the hybrid nature of pandemic work, there remains an unfair advantage for in-office workers.

“It’s all about being more salient in the boss’s mind,” Jeffrey Pfeffer professor of organizational behavior at Stanford University Graduate School of Business, told WSJ. “Whether it’s fair, you’re increasing your chances of landing high-profile assignments, raises and promotions, simply because your name pops into the heads of those making decisions.”

This divide ultimately leads to disabled employees feeling like second-class citizens in our own jobs. No employee should be forced to choose between career advancement and their health where an accommodation exists to mitigate roadblocks. Leadership needs to make concerted efforts to engage employees and provide equal opportunity regardless of where the work is being done.