Red Flags in Job Descriptions: What Disabled Applicants Notice

A digital illustration of the Washington Nationals logo prominently displayed in the center, surrounded by vibrant red, white, and blue accents. The background features a baseball diamond with dramatic lighting, creating a sense of energy and pride. The design emphasizes the team's colors and tradition in a bold and professional style

Today, I find myself reflecting on a troubling trend in job postings that claim inclusivity while subtly discouraging applicants with disabilities. A perfect example comes from a job description for a Communications Manager with the Washington Nationals. The LinkedIn algorithm suggested I'd be a top applicant. A chance to blend my love of communication and baseball? My interest was piqued. On the surface, it outlines standard communication responsibilities—drafting press releases, coordinating interviews, and managing media relations. All of these align perfectly with the skills expected of a professional communicator.

But then comes the Physical/Environmental Requirements section, which demands:

• Standing for long periods.
• Walking long distances.
• Climbing up and down stairs.
• Lifting up to 45 pounds.

For a role focused on media relations, where exactly does lifting 45 pounds come into play? These physical requirements raise serious questions.

Let’s unpack this: The job description explicitly states that the Washington Nationals are "dedicated to offering equal opportunity employment and advancement…including disability." Yet, these physical demands feel like unnecessary hurdles, particularly for disabled professionals. This disconnect is more than an oversight—it's a systemic issue. Arbitrary physical requirements often serve as a quiet signal that disabled applicants may not be fully welcome.

Job descriptions like this one, with their misaligned physical requirements, highlight a glaring gap between intention and execution. They inadvertently screen out highly qualified candidates, not because they lack the skills, but because the posting assumes physical ability is synonymous with competence.

Nowhere in my 15 years as a communications professional have I been asked to lift 45 pounds.

Employers must evaluate if physical demands are truly essential. Is there a genuine reason for a communications manager to climb stairs or carry heavy loads? If not, these requirements should be removed.

Companies claiming to value inclusivity need to ensure their job postings reflect that ethos. Accessibility isn’t just about wheelchairs and ramps—it’s about eliminating unnecessary barriers in hiring.

Postings should explicitly encourage applicants to discuss accommodations. A simple line—“We are happy to accommodate your needs to perform essential job functions”—can make a world of difference.

Language matters. If a company’s goal is true inclusivity, they must start by removing arbitrary barriers from their job descriptions. Let’s make sure equal opportunity is more than just a tagline.

We're clearly in the off-season and the Washington Nationals latest job posting is a strikeout. Hopefully their next Communications Manager can encourage the use of inclusive language.

Sebastian Stan’s Call to Normalize Disability: Hollywood’ Role in Cultural Change

Last night, Sebastian Stan stood on the Golden Globes stage and delivered an acceptance speech that was equal parts gratitude and a societal call for more disability inclusion in storytelling saying, “Our ignorance and discomfort around disability and disfigurement has to end. We have to normalize it and continue to expose ourselves and our children to it. [We should] encourage acceptance.”

We’ve come a long way in some ways, but the reality is that we still have miles to go. Disability is often treated as "other," whether it’s the barriers we face in accessing physical spaces, the battles we fight for workplace accommodations, or the simple dignity of being included in the stories society chooses to tell.

A Different Man brings that reality to life. It’s not just a film about disability—it’s a film with disabled voices at its core. This matters. Representation is the difference between being seen and being invisible.

And yet, disability remains woefully underrepresented. According to a 2022 GLAAD report, less than 4% of major studio films included disabled characters—and even fewer were played by actors with disabilities. Meanwhile, 20% of the population in the U.S. identifies as disabled. That disconnect doesn’t just hurt those of us in the disability community; it limits society as a whole. When stories exclude disability, they fail to reflect the full spectrum of human experience.

This isn’t just about Hollywood. It’s about workplaces that still treat accommodations like favors instead of rights. It’s about public spaces designed without us in mind. It’s about a culture that sees disability as something to overcome, rather than simply as part of life. As Stan put it, “These films are real and they’re necessary, and we can’t be afraid and look away.” That sentiment doesn’t just apply to film—it’s a challenge to all of us.

Disability will likely touch each of us, directly or indirectly, at some point in our lives. But we shouldn’t care about disability only because it might one day be our story. We should care because these stories are real, human, and powerful. They deserve to be told—not to inspire, but to be part of the fabric of who we are as a society.

The Pandemic's Impact on Workplace Inclusion: Lessons from the RVO Health Panel

A Zoom screenshot showing Disability Advocate Ryan Honick, and fellow RVO Health panelists, Alina Sharon, Ryan McKenna, Robin Hough, and Jessica Simon as part of a DEI in the workplace discussion.

Yesterday, as part of National Disability Employment Awareness Month, I had the distinct honor of joining a panel with the dynamic team from RVO Health. The topic? A subject close to my heart: diversity, equity, inclusion, and access in the workplace, especially in the light of the pandemic and its aftermath.

Firstly, I'd like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to Alina Sharon, Ryan McKenna, Robin Hough, and Jess (Leavitt) Simon. The depth of our conversation, the insights shared, and the commitment to fostering an inclusive environment was truly commendable. It's not every day that you get to be part of such an enlightening discussion, and I am continually encouraged by the positive steps that RVO Health is taking.

I've seen firsthand the challenges and opportunities that come with fostering an inclusive environment. The pandemic has only heightened the need for workplaces to be more adaptable, understanding, and inclusive. Jess (Leavitt) Simon captured this sentiment perfectly, stating, "We can't unring the bell of COVID. COVID completely disrupted and changed the way of work. The employers that are going to retain and attract the best talent are going to have to figure out how to do it differently." 

From my personal journey, I know the importance of conversations like these to deepen understanding and empathy and truly make a difference. True inclusivity begins as a cultural attitude and a commitment to continual dialogue about the needs and contributions of every employee. The pandemic brought to light the importance of mental health, flexibility, and the need for employers to be more understanding and accommodating.

RVO Health's commitment to these values is evident, and I am excited to see the strides they will make in the future. The panel discussion was a testament to the fact that when organizations and individuals come together with a shared vision, real change is possible.

To everyone who joined us for the panel, thank you for being part of this important conversation. Let's continue to push boundaries, challenge norms, and create workplaces where everyone feels valued and included.